Report: Gravity-Based Energy Storage Could Prove Cheaper Than Batteries

on April 20, 2018

Storing energy by suspending weights in disused mine shafts could be cheaper than batteries for balancing the grid, new research has found.

According to a report by analysts at Imperial College London and seen by BusinessGreen, gravity-fed energy storage systems can provide frequency response at a cost cheaper than most other storage solutions.

Gravity-fed systems use a heavy weight – up to 2,000 tonnes – suspended in a deep shaft by cables attached to winches. When there is excess electricity, for example on a windy day, the weight is winched to the top of the shaft ready to generate power.

This weight can then be released when required – in less than a second – and the winches become generators, producing either a large burst of electricity quickly, or releasing it more slowly depending on what is needed.

The Imperial analysis is based on a levelised cost of storage (LCOS), a calculation which takes into account all relevant performance factors including a project’s capex, operating costs, discount rate and degradation costs over a 25-year period.

According to the paper, gravity-fed storage providing frequency response costs $141 per kW, compared to $154 for a lithium-ion battery, $187 for lead acid batteries and $312 for flywheel.

The numbers assume the storage performs 700 cycles per year of 15 minutes each, at a power output of 4MW, to help manage the real time grid balance between system demand and total generation.

Click Here to Read Full Article

Share this post:
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsReport: Gravity-Based Energy Storage Could Prove Cheaper Than Batteries