Energy storage systems are on the rise as a component of new microgrids or portable energy supplies that have traditionally used fossil fuel-based resources. But utilities need to undertake more widespread usage of storage on permanent microgrids, according to Guidehouse Insights.
Peter Asmus, who developed the “Energy Storage for Microgrids and Remote Power Systems” report with primary author Ricardo Rodriquez, said that utilities need to play a bigger role in developing permanent microgrids. Utilities have played a lead role in remote microgrid projects in places like Alaska, but are not in the lead on permanent microgrids in California or anywhere.
Utilities seem to be “waiting to see how it’s all going to play out,” he said in an interview with Microgrid Knowledge.
He also noted that California utilities rejected some proposals for storage on permanent microgrids because they didn’t think the microgrids could be up and running by this year’s fire season.
Such efforts as Pacific Gas & Electric’s December 2019 solicitation for 20 microgrids, totalling more than 500 MW, was disappointing to storage developers because it mostly used fossil-fuel sources and placed the microgrids at substations rather than customer sites. The utility in March said it had temporarily suspended, but not canceled the project.
Adding storage to microgrid projects, however, offers various benefits to the system, including enhancing the ability of the microgrid to manage renewable energy. The battery can store energy for discharge in the evening when the solar panels are no longer generating electricity, for example.
Recent Comments